HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3150 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Heard. Present contempt application has been preferred for alleged non compliance of the judgment and order dated 18.03.2024 passed in Writ C No. 2558 of 2024. The relevant extract of the said judgment and order is being reproduced hereinbelow:- "In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2 Managing Director, U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Limited, Lucknow, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law." Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the representation of the applicant has been decided by order dated 14.08.2024 and the same has been filed alongwith the compliance affidavit filed on 06.09.2024 against which no objection has been filed till date hence, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Radhika Singh, Gokul Seth, Ram Raj, Rishabh Raj Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Prashant Singh Atal M/S Jbus Solar Power And Equipment Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Its Director Sri. Prashant Singh .....Applicant(s) Mr. Yogesh Pawar, M.D., U.P., Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd., Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) dismissed as such. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant has disputed the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and has submitted that the claim of the applicant has been rejected illegally and arbitrarily but unable to dispute the submissions raised by learned counsel for the respondent. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record of the case, it is found that representation of the application has been decided in pursuance of the order passed by the Writ Court whereby Writ Court has simply directed the respondent to decide the representation/claim of the applicant and brought on record by filing compliance affidavit one year ago against which no objection has been filed till date. In view of the aforesaid, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice issued, if any, stands discharged. October 16, 2025 Ashish CAPL No. 3150 of 2024 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench