ZESHAAN SHEKH ALIAS RICKY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
W.P.(Cr.)/490/2025 · 2025-09-19
Gautam Kumar Choudhary, Sujit Narayan Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20216 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20216 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:29010-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (Cr.) No. 490 of 2025 --------- Zeshaan Shekh @ Ricky, S/o Shekh Samiullah, R/o Indian Aya Line Rinpass QU, P.O & P.S Kanke, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand)
… … Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, having Office at Project Building, PO Dhurwa, PS Dhurwa District Ranchi (Jharkhand)
2. Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Prison and Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, having Office at Project Bhawan, PO Dhurwa, PS Dhurwa District Ranchi (Jharkhand)
3. Additional Secretary, Department of Home, Prison and Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, having Office at Project Bhawan, PO Dhurwa, PS Dhurwa District Ranchi (Jharkhand)
4. The District Magistrate, Ranchi, Office at Ranchi, Jharkhand P.O G.P.O and P.S Kotwali, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand)
5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, P.O G.P.O and P.S Kotwali, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand)
6. The Jail Superintendent, Hotwar Central Jail, Ranchi P.O Hotwar and P.S Khelgaon, District Ranchi (Jharkhand)
… … Respondent ---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Kishore Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Deepankar, AC to GA-III ----------- 07/Dated: 19.09.2025
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner seeks leave to this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition on the ground that the final
order passed by the State Government said to be in confirmation with the decision taken by the District Magistrate, Ranchi.
2. There is no opposition by the learned counsel appearing for the State.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Further, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that liberty may be given to challenge the order passed by the State Government by approaching the appropriate forum.
5. Liberty as prayed for, is allowed.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) 19.09.2025 Pawan/-