Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202144 (ALL)

AJEET SINGH @ RAJA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/9925/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9925 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.117 of 2025, under Sections 64(1), 87, 137(2), 351(3) BNS and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(v), P.S. Imaliya, District- Sitapur. 4. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the daughter of informant was missing and she was enticed away by the applicant. Subsequently, in the statements of victim recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS, she has not supported the prosecution version. She has also stated that both of them had solemnized marriage. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the fact that the statements of victim do not corroborate with the prosecution story coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 01.07.2025 having one criminal history of minor offence, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Ajeet Singh @ Raja be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ajeet Singh @ Raja .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9925 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench