Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202134 (MAD)

B.VISWANATHAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/44105/2025 · 2025-11-19

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No. 44105 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.11.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No. 44105 of 2025 B.Viswanathan S/o.Balakrishnan, Old No.9, New No.21, 2nd Street, Govindarajapuram, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Chennai District, Singaravelar Maaligai, Chennai-600 001 2.The Tahsildhar Guindy Taluk, Guindy, Chennai-600 032 3.The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Buildings, Chennai-600 003 4.The Zonal Officer Zone-XIII, LB Road, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 _________ p. 2 W.P.No. 44105 of 2025 5.P.Chandra W/o. Late R.Pushpalingam, No.21, 2nd Street, Govindarajapuram, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 6.Arulmigu Shree Vembadi Nagathamman Temple Rep. by its Founder P. Chandra, No.9/21, 2nd Street, Govindarajapuram, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents No.1 to 4 to remove the illegal temple construction of the 5th respondent based on the representation dated 30.07.2025 within a time to be stipulated by this Hon’ble Court. For Petitioner: Mr.V.Ramanareddy For Respondent: Mr.V.Veeramani Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the parties. _________ p. 3 W.P.No. 44105 of 2025 2. This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is completely frivolous. The petitioner has already filed a suit against the private respondent alleging encroachment and obstruction to the passage on a land, which he claims to have purchased. The petitioner has, now, filed this petition on the allegation that it is a street, which needs to be cleared. There is no material on record to sustain the said allegation. The pleadings are bald and without any basis. 3. The petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 19.11.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr _________ p. 4 W.P.No. 44105 of 2025 To: 1.The District Collector Chennai District, Singaravelar Maaligai, Chennai-600 001 2.The Tahsildhar Guindy Taluk, Guindy, Chennai-600 032 3.The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Buildings, Chennai-600 003 4.The Zonal Officer Zone-XIII, LB Road, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 _________ p. 5 W.P.No. 44105 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. bbr W.P.No. 44105 of 2025 19.11.2025 _________