Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202131 (ALL)

FOOL CHANDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1502/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1502 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. No one appears on behalf of the informant despite service of notice. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.231 of 2025, under Sections 69 BNS, Police Station Madhauganj, District Hardoi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the informant met with the applicant and despite requesting for court marriage he was refusing to do so. No allegations of physical relations on false pretext of marriage was levelled. The applicant stated that he is ready and willing to marry the victim in case she agrees. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer. 5. Considering the statement given by the victim herself, prima facie, case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Fool Chandra be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bond of Rs 10000/- to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Narendra Gupta, Mohammad Salim Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Fool Chandra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 16, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1502 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench