1 2025:CGHC:19799 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 406 of 2025 1 - Nitin Vinayak Ghumde S/o Vinayak Ghumde Aged About 38 Years Occupation Businessman R/o S-1 Pragatinagar Abhinandan Tilhari - 482001 Jabalpur M.P. (Oner Of Vehicle No. M.P.-20 - Hb- 4708 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Sunita Bai W/o Jagatram Yadav Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Umda Post Office Surdung Thana Bhilai -3 Tahsil Patan District - Durg 2 - Jagatram Yadav S/o Late Bauwaram Yadav Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Umda Post Office Surdung Thana Bhilai -3 Tahsil Patan District - Durg 3 - Smt. Chandrika Bai W/o Tekram Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Umda Post Office Surdung Thana Bhilai -3 Tahsil Patan District - Durg 4 - Pukendra Alies Sonu Yadav S/o Jagatram Yadav Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Umda Post Office Surdung Thana Bhilai -3 Tahsil Patan District - Durg 5 - Roshanlal Yadav S/o Jagatram Yadav Aged About 14 Years Minor And Represented Through Mother Respondent No. 1 Smt. Sunitabai R/o Village Umda Post Office Surdung Thana Bhilai -3 Tahsil Patan District - Durg 6 - Smt. Sarita Bai W/o Rajesh Kumar Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Nardhi Thana Bhilai -3 Tahsil Patan District - Durg (C.G.) (Res. No./1 To 6 (Claimants) 7 - Pahad Singh Alies Paharsingh Thakur S/o Shri Khartam Singh Aged About 23 Years R/o Para Sehra Sumhera Thana Pidrai District - Mandla Madhya Pradesh And C/o Nitin Vinayak Ghumde S/o Vinayak Ghumde Address - I- 102 Rishabh Prime City Adarshnagar Durg Tahsil And District - Durg (Driver Of Vehicle No. M.P. 20-Hb- 4708 ) 8 - Magma H.D.I. General Insurance Company Limited Registered And Head Office Mamga House 24 Park Street Kolkata 700016 Through Branch Manager Jagat Sons Tower Near Honda Petrol Pump Jabalpur 2 Madhyapradesh - 482001 At Present 5th Floor Dainik Bhaskar Press Compex G.E. Road Raipur Chhattisgarh (Inusrer Of Vehicle No. M.P. 20- Hb- 4708 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate appearing though video-conferencing Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 01-05-2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application under Section 169(2) of MV Act read with Order 11 Rule 12 of CPC was moved by the Insurance Company before the Tribunal and vide order dated 19.03.2025, liberty was afforded to file reply. He further submits that on 16.04.2025, order has already been passed on application, therefore, he prays that petitioner may be permitted to challenge the very order by availing the appropriate recourse. 2) Permission granted. 3) Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of affording liberty in favor of petitioner to challenge the said order before the appropriate forum. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya