HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12235 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri R.S.Tewari, learned counsel for the opposite party no.1, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 & 3 and perused the record. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the petitioner was appointed under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974. His salary has not been fixed taking into consideration the date of initial appointment. Similarly, pensionary dues are not accordingly calculated. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the grievance of the petitioner would be met in case his representation is decided by the opposite party No.2 in a time bound manner to which, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties No.2 & 3 and the learned standing counsel have no objection. In view of aforesaid, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 within a period of three weeks from today, annexing therewith a copy of the present writ petition and all other documents in support of his case along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved, the opposite party No.2 shall decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kuldeep Singh Kalhans Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Uday Veer Singh Buddhu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) certified copy of this order is placed before him. The writ petition is disposed of. October 16, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12235 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench