HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1494 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. No one appears on behalf of the informant despite service of notice. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.122 of 2025, under Sections 70(1) BNS, P.S. Rudauli, District Ayodhya. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on 2.4.2025 when the informant went to agricultural field the brother in law of the informant committed wrong on her. My attention is drawn to the statement under Section 183 BNSS wherein the victim sated that she was mother of three children and stated that she had get similar case registered against one Pandit ji wherein she admitted that when her husband and mother in law did not believe her. It was also stated that she had earlier lodged similar FIR against her father in law also. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer. 5. Considering the volume of allegations and the fact that the victim herself admitted that she had lodged a similar FIR against her father in law also, prima facie, case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avinash Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepak Kumar@ Deepak .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Deepak Kumar@ Deepak be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bond of Rs 5000 to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 16, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1494 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench