Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202120 (ALL)

BUDDHU PRASAD @ PRADHAN LONA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/9886/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9886 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.185 of 2025, under Sections 305, 324(4), 331(4), 331(4), 317(2), 111(2B) BNS, P.S. Malipur District- Ambedkar Nagar. 3. It has been argued that similarly situated co-accused has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 15.10.2025 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.9944/2025. Therefore, he may also be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the co-accused has already been granted bail coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 14.09.2025 having criminal history of three cases which has been duly explained in the supplementary affidavit, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Buddhu Prasad @ Pradhan Lona be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nijam Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Buddhu Prasad @ Pradhan Lona .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9886 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench