HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6166 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Sarvesh Kumar Pandey, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Anil Kumar Kushwaha, the learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection regarding the mis- joinder and non-joinder of the parties in the petition. He has submitted that the instant petition has been filed challenging the validity of an order passed by the civil court in which the State of U.P. was not a party, yet the State has been impleaded as opposite party and several other parties before the civil court have not been impleaded in this petition. 3. Confronted with the aforesaid objections, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. October 16, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sarvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Tanweer Fatima .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench