Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20211 (PNJ)

DIWAN SINGH SHARMA v. UOI & ORS

CWP/2891/2002 · 2025-04-25

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP NO.2891-2002(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (304) CWP NO.2891-2002(O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 25.04.2025 Diwan Singh Sharma ............Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others .............Respondents CORAM HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD S.BHARDWAJ Present None for the petitioner. Mr.Maninder Singh Sidhu, Sr.Panel Counsel, GOI for respondent no.1. Mr. Rajinder Paul, Advocate, with Mr. B.B.Bagga, Advocate, for respondents no.2 to 5. *** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) 1. The instant petition has been filed for issuance of direction to respondents to re-fix the pension of the petitioner in terms of the regulations framed by respondent no.2. A further prayer has been made for releasing the arrears of pension along with interest thereupon @ 11% after revising pay of the petitioner in view of the new pay scales. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Notice issued to the petitioner has been received back with the report that the petitioner has left the given address. 3. Counsel for the respondents no.2 to 5 submits that as a matter of fact all demands of petitioner have already been met and the benefits have been released. 4. Faced with the above statement and noticing that no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the present petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Mamta 2025.04.29 09:33 CWP NO.2891-2002(O&M) 2 5. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to revive the present petition in case the statement made by counsel for respondents no.2 to 5 is found to be factually incorrect. 25.04.2025 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) mamta JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Mamta 2025.04.29 09:33