HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4589 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred for alleged non- compliance of order dated 12.08.2024, the judgment extract is quoted hereinbelow:- "In the given circumstances all the concerned parties shall approach the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate concerned for demarcation of their respective lands who shall consider and decide the said proceedings within a statutory period of three months provided under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Till then the parties shall not interfere or raise any construction over the property in dispute. The Police shall also not harass any party and shall only ensure compliance of the order of concerned Sub Divisional Magistrate." 2. Learned counsel for applicant has submitted that this Court vide its order dated 12.08.2024 has granted a protection that the parties shall not interfere in any construction over the property in dispute till the pendency of the demarcation proceedings pending before the Sub Divisional Officer concerned. 3. It is further submitted that the respondent no.2 has put the locks on 11.11.2024 after the order was passed by the Writ Court dated 12.08.2024 who put locks on the property is under dispute. 4. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 has submitted that the respondent no.2 has filed an application for dismissal of the contempt application Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Archana Rawat Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rahul Mishra Ravi Kumar Kaushal .....Applicant(s) Abhay Pratap Singh Station House Officer Police Station Wazirganj Dist. Gonda And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s) alongwith an affidavit and he has specifically mentioned in para-17, that the photograph is annexed alongwith the contempt application, the property was locked by the applicant himself and it is his motorcycle which is visible in the photograph. 5. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 has further submitted that the respondent no.2 had not put any lock or interfered with the property in dispute. 6. Learned State Counsel has also submitted that as per the instruction received from the S.H.O. that after the investigation, it is found that the lock was put by the applicant himself and not by the respondent no.2. 7. After the affidavit and submission made by the learned counsel for respondent no.2, no contempt is made out as the allegation of the applicant, is found to be incorrect and the present contempt application is devoid of merit and is dismissed. 8. Notice issued earlier, if any, stands discharged. October 16, 2025 Satish CAPL No. 4589 of 2024 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench