Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202091 (ALL)

JITENDRA @ JITENDRA MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (HOME DEPTT.) LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1492/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1492 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Jagjeet Singh, who has filed his vakalatnama today on behalf of informant and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.546 of 2025, under Sections 69, 351(3) BNS, Police Station Mandiyaon, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR the informant aged about 30 years stated that she went to the applicant and on the false pretext of marriage physical relations was formed between them and now the applicant is refusing to marry her. 4. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer. 5. Considering the nature of allegations and the age of the victim coupled with the fact that the relationship continued for long period of time, the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail particularly. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Jitendra @ Jitendra Maurya be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bond of Rs 10000 to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amitesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jitendra @ Jitendra Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home Deptt.) Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 16, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1492 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench