HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6064 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1, 2 and has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent no.4. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.5 and 6 is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners pray for the following reliefs:- "(A) Direct the opposite party no.1 District Magistrate Ambedkar Nagar, to decide the pending application for stay, moved by petitioners under Rule 115 P of the U.P. Zamindari Aabolition & Land Reforms Rules, 1952 for cancellation of the lease bearing Case No.202504040001314 "Ramesh Tiwari and others Vs. Sheela Devi and others", pending before him. (B) Direct the opposite party nos.2 and 3 restraining them to not dispossess the petitioners from Gata No.592, village Pratapipur, District Ambedkar Nagar. (C) Direct the opposite party no.2 and 3 to restrain the private respondents from claiming or taking possession of the said land until the application filed by the petitioner under Rule 115 P of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Rules, 1952 for cancellation of the lease is decided." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Pathak, Rshi Muni Mishra, Vijay Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ramesh Tiwari And Another .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s) Learned Standing counsel has provided a copy of the written instructions dated 16th of October, 2025 under the signatures of the District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar indicating that the matter of which expedition is sought is now 25th of October, 2025. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending application of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. October 16, 2025 ank A227 No. 6064 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench