Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202076 (ALL)

DILSHAD @ SANIDUL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/9921/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9921 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Shri Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant, whose vakalatnama filed today is taken on record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.209 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)M, 142, 61(2)A BNS and Section 5(L)/6 of POCSO Act, P.S. Nawabganj, District- Gonda. 3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the daughters of informant, aged about 16 and 14 years were enticed away by the accused named in the FIR. Subsequently, in the statement of victim, whose age is 16 years, recorded under Section 180 BNSS, has stated that she knew the applicant and had gone along with him. Tentative age of the victim is 16 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the statement of victim does not corroborate with the prosecution story coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 20.06.2025 having criminal history of one case which has been duly explained in para-31 of the bail application, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Dilshad @ Sanidu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Imran Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dilshad @ Sanidul .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9921 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench