SHAHANWAJ AHAMAD @ RANU AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/1560/2025 · 2025-10-16
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202070 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202070 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1560 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Sri Sarvesh Baranwal, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:-
"To quash/set-aside the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1236/2025 (State Versus Akaram & Others) arising out of the impugned charge-sheet No. 01/2025, dated 28/07/2025 filed by the investigating officer in Case Crime No. 0179/2025, under section 191(2), 125(1), 352, 351(3) B.N.S. & 3(1)(s)/3(2)(Va) S.C./S.T. Act, pertaining to Police Station- Kaisarganj, District- Bahraich; to quash the cognizance/summoning order dated 22/09/2025 passed by the court of learned Special judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Bahraich, whereby the applicants has been summoned under section 191(2), 125(1), 352, 351(3) B.N.S. & 3(1)/3(2)(Va) S.C./S.T. Act, for facing trial under the aforesaid sections."
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shahanwaj Ahamad @ Ranu And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8.
For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. October 16, 2025 Arpan NA528 No. 1560 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench