Linguberi Tulasi Das v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/14259/2025 · 2025-06-11
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20207 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20207 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
w\ \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 14259 OF 2025 Between: Linguberi Tulasi Das, S/o late Simmayya, aged about 61 R/o at D.No- 11-3-29, Kasimvalasa Village, Amadalavalasa Srikakualm Mandal Srikakulam District, AP- 532185 years, cultivation. Municipality, ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Amaravati, Guntur District,
2. The District Collector, Srikakulam District, Andhra
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Tahslldar, Srikakulam Mandal, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The VRO, Kasimvalasa Village, Srikakulam Mandal, Srikakulam to Pradesh. District, A.P
6. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam. O/o S.P, Srikakulam-532001
7. The Station House Officer, Srikakulam Rural Police Station
8. Labba Srinu, S/o Late Laxmana Rao, aged about 37 Srikakulam years, cultivation R/o at Kasimvalasa Village, Srikakualm Mandal and Srikakulam AP- 532185. District,
9. Gujjala Krishna, S/o Late Pothayya, aged about 58 years, cultivation R/o at Kasimvalasa Village, Srikakualm Mandal and Srikakulam District AP-532185. 10. Bommali Simhachalam, - cultivation R/o at R/at Kasimvalasa Srikakulam District, AP- 532185
11. Labba Suresh, S/o Appalasuri, Kasimvalasa Village, Srikakualm
532185. 12. Laveti Appanna, S/o Kondayya Kasimvalasa Village, Srikakualm
532185. BammidI Apparao, S/o Late Jammayya cultivation R/o at Kasimvalasa Village District. AP-532185. 14. Vangara Ramu, S/o Late Mallesh, at Kasimvalasa Village, Srikakualm
532185. 15. Allada Ganni Raju, S/o Suribabu, at Kasimvalasa Village, Srikakualm
532185. S/o Late Ramulu, aged about 46 years Village, Srikakualm Mandal and aged about 35 years, cultivation Mandal Srikakulam District R/o at . AP- ’ 38 years, cultivation R/o I Mandal Srikakulam District at AP-
13. aged about 58 years, Srikakualm Mandal Srikakulam aged about 40 years, cultivation R/o Mandal Srikakulam District, AP- aged about 40 years, cultivation Mandal Srikakulam District R/o AP- -RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 the circumstances be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction of writ of Mandamus declaring are making efforts to dispossess 88-10 of the Constitution of India praying that in stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may particularly, one in the nature No.4, 5 and 7, who the action of Respondent the petitioner from his land in Survey No. admeasuring to , district.
Srikakulam Mandal demolish/ an extent of Ac.0.28 cents, located at Srikakulam Kasimvalasa Village and In that also trying to agricultural activities uproot the borewell following the procedure meant for without established by law. This violative of principles of natural justice and 300A of the Constitution laid down by the Hon’ble act is illegal, arbitrary and also violative of Articles and 14,21 as well as contrary to the judgment Apex Court in Rame Gowda v of India M. Varadappa
Naidu (2004) 1 SCC interfere into the Survey No. 88-10, Srikakulam district, trying to demolish/ except due process of law. ^69 and consequently direct the respondents not to property situated in in cents, located at and in that also egricultural activities peaceful possession of the subject admeasuring to - Srikakulam Mandal. an extent of Ac.0.28 Kasimvalasa Village ' meant for uproot the borewell 1^0: 1 OF pnog Petition under Section stated in the affidavit pleased to direct the of the subject admeasuring to Srikakulan Mandal. uproot the borewell law. 151 CPC praying that in the cicircumstances filed in support of the petition respondents not to interfere i property of the petitioner si the High Court may be possession in the peaceful situated in Survey No. 88-10 cents, iocated at Srikakulam an extent of Ac.0.28 I Kasimvalasa Village I meant for agricultural district, and in that also trying to demolish/ activities except due process of Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent Counsel for the Respondent Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the ■ P- VISESWAR RAO Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR Nos.6 & 7; GP FOR Nos. to 15;— following; ORDER revenue HOME
1 APHC010282422025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [0] THURSDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 14259 OF 2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Linguberi Tulasi Das AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.P VISESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
ORDER:- Heard Sri P. Viseswar Rao,
learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land without following due process of law.
2.
2 .n
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner is an unauthorized occupant over the subject land and it is further argued that the petitioner in support of his contention, has not filed any documentary evidence in respect of the subject land.
3. Having regard to the
submissions made, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction to the respondents to follow due process of laws and pass appropriate orders. Till such time, the respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land.
4. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU assistant registrar TVSECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Building, Amaravati, Guntur District,
2. The District Collector, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh.
4. The Tahslldar, Srikakulam Mandal, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh.
5. The VRO, Kasimvalasa Village, Srikakulam Mandal, Srikakulam District, A.P
6. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam, O/o S.P, Srikakulam-532001
7. The Station House Officer, Srikakulam Rural Police Station, Srikakulam
8. One CO to Sri P. Viseswar Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
9. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
10. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
11. Three CD Copies. ssb
w ^ 9* HIGH COURT DATED:12/06/2025
ORDER WP.No.14259 of 2025 13 JUN 2035 4£?S(»ATCH*2i X \c> <» ^/y DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS