Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202065 (MAD)

D.Prem kumar v. The State Rep. by, Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/31295/2025 · 2025-11-17

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.31295 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.11.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.31295 of 2025 Prem Kumar ... Petitioner -vs- State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, C1, Sriperumbudur Police Station, Crime No.129 of 2025 ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in Crime No.129 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ********** 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.31295 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 109(1), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 129 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner due to previous enmity waylaid the defacto complainant and thereafter taken him and attacked him indiscriminately by using wooden log and also threatened him and also attempted to cut by using knife. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is a case of false complaint and victim has been discharged from the hospital. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition as may be imposed by this Court. Therefore, he prays for grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police reported that the petitioner is the main accused in this case and used the wooden log and knife and attacked the defacto complainant indiscriminately. He further submitted that the petitioner has four previous cases of similar nature. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.31295 of 2025 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant and caused severe injuries and also taking note of the fact that the petitioner is having bad antecedents, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 17.11.2025 mpa To 1. The Inspector of Police, C1, Sriperumbudur Police Station. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.31295 of 2025 K. RAJASEKAR, J. mpa Crl.O.P.No.31295 of 2025 17.11.2025 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.31295 of 2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis