Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20206 (AP)

SUVVAN LACK SINGH @ LAL SINGH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/5891/2025 · 2025-07-01

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

i L=--=,=ts. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA' WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY ''S* TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5891 OF 2025 Betwee n : 1. Suvvan Lack Singh @ Lal Singh, S/o Jai Singh aged about 25 years, R/o G.Madugula village and mandal, ASR district 2. Kadam Singh , S/o Bhavani Singh,aged about 22 years ,R/o BhagaI, Sephta, Jalor Taluk'i mandaI,` Rajasthan ...petitioners/Accused No.4 and 6 AND The State of Andhra Prade`sh, through SHO S.Rayavaram Police station, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Anclhra Pradesh Amaravathi Guntur district ...RespondentlComplainanE pet-ltion under sections`-J4'80 & 483 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memldrandum of grounds filed in support of the criminal petition, the High C®urt`may be pleased to release the Petitioners/ A4 and A6 on bail in connection with Crime No.1 of 2025 of S.Rayavaram policd\ station Anakapalli district under section 20(b)( )(c)25r/w8(c) of NDPS Act 1985 dated 2-1 -2025. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the` arguments of SRI K PRIDHVI RAJU Advocate for the Petitioners, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the I?despondent, the Court made the following -i; t` HONJBLE SRI JuSTICE KI SREENIVASA REDDY £±Em±na±±e±!±±QnJ±!g±S9±J2f _ 2 0 2 5 Qrdir: The Criminal Petition, under sections 480 & 483 of Bharatjya Nagarjk Suraksha sanhI-ta, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners/A-4 and A-6, seeking regular bail, I'n Crime No.1 of 2025 of S. Rayavaram police statI'On, Anakapalli DistrI'Ct. 2. A case has been registered agaI|nSt the petitioners and others for the offences punishable under sections 2O(b)(ii)(C), 25 r/w 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropic substances Act, 1985. 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on o2.01.2025 at 10.00 hours, on receipt of credible information about iI]ega[ transportation of ganja, the sl of Police, Kotauratla police station, In- charge of s. Rayavaram police Station, along with hI'S Staff and mediators, rushed to NH-16 Highway, Gurra NanajiJs fields, back side to sri srinivasa Lodge and found Al and A2 sl'tting in a car bearing No.AP40 BH 3733 parked under a treel on verification, it is found that car was loaded with 110 Kgs of ganJ'a| The accused persons were taken into custody and contraband was seized under the cover of mediators report. '``\,'\ 3=F-P=.= =-F' 2 ~| 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were shown as Accused Nos.4 and 6 basing on the confessional statements of co-accused. The petitioners were remanded to judicial custody on 15.04|2025 and since then they are languishing in jail. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that major portion of the investigation has been completed. -6I Heard. Perused the record. 7. A perusal o'fthe material on record goes to show that basing on the confessional statements of co-accused, the petitioners are shown as accused in the present crime. The contraband allegedly seized from the possession of the accused is 110 Kgs of ganJ-a. The Petitioners Were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.04.2025 and since then they are in jail, Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that maJ-Or portion Of investigation has been completed, but charge sheet is not filed for apprehension of A3 and A5 and that A6 belonging to Rajasthan State. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that A3 and A5 were arrested by the police. Since the entire case rests on the confessional statements of co-accused, this Court is inclined to release the petitioners on bail. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioners/ Accused Nos.4 and 6 shall be released on bail on each of them executing a personal bond for Rs.1O,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the --y .,¢gr ``` ¢`~ _i learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for trial of Offences under the NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam. The petitioners shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned on every Sunday between lO.00 AM and 1.00 PM till filing of the charge sheet. a\ A. | SD/-N.NAGAMMA .ASS]STAN For //TRUE COPY// T&GISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The I Additional Districtl-& Sessions Judge-Gum-Special Judge for Trial of offences under NDp's Act,1985, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Superintendent, `CehtraI Prison, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Station House Officers S Rayavaram Police Station, Anakapalli District 4, One CC to SRI. K PRIDHVI RAJU Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. One spare copy PSR HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED : 02/07/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5891 of 2025 ALLOWED iI. :;='i:,i^ \ \ JluL 1\1\ %% *`l ;.i-':-t,:;;:tt:I,fe?.-*