Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202059 (ALL)

VIJAY KUMAR @ SINTU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 4 OTHERS

BAIL/9923/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9923 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.391 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 351(3) BNS and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, P.S.- Kadipur District- Sultanpur. 3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the daughter of informant was missing and she was enticed away by the applicant. Subsequently, in the statement of victim recorded under Section 180 BNSS, she has admitted that she knew the applicant and they used to talk to each other for the past four years and in fact, her father had left her at the applicant's home. Tentative age of the victim is around 16 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the statement of victim does not corroborate with the prosecution story coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 23.07.2025 having no criminal history, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Vijay Kumar @ Sintu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Achche Ram Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vijay Kumar @ Sintu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9923 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench