SHER MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LUCKNOW
CRLRD/38/2022 · 2025-10-16
Manjive Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202048 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202048 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 38 of 2022 Court No. - 27 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Learned counsel for the revisionist, at the very outset, has submitted that the revisionist may be permitted to withdraw the criminal revision with liberty to pursue other legal remedies available to her.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission, this criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. October 16, 2025 akhilesh/- Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Prabhakar Pandey, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Shubham Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sanjay Kumar Singh (Manjive Shukla,J.) Sher Mohammad .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench