Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202036 (ALL)

SATISH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/10143/2025 · 2025-10-16

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10143 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.37 of 2025, under Sections 420, 406, 467, 504, 506 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Baskhari, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 19.02.2025 against the applicant and another person Satish, besides an unnamed former Branch Manager, stating that Bharat Financial Inclusion Limited company is a 100% subsidiary in IndusInd Bank. The applicants were employees of the company, they used to collect installments towards repayment of loan from the existing customers and they misappropriated the amount. 4. It is recorded in the case diary that the applicant has given a written statement to the police stating that he used to collect money for the bank and as per instructions of the Branch Manager and Field Unit Manager, the money was deposited in the accounts of migration members and defaulter members. He has stated that although he has done the aforesaid things under the instruction of higher officials, they themselves are threatening him. He further stated that he has worked for 45 days in the bank and his salary has not been paid. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nijam Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satish .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 4A. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused Aneesh Kumar Sharma who was assigned similar role has been enlarged on bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.09.2025 passed in criminal misc. bail application No. 9169 of 2025. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks parity with the order of the co-accused. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 6. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during the investigation and a charge sheet has been submitted on 10.09.20250 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the nature of allegations coupled with the statement of the applicant in the written statement given to the police, the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 20.08.2025 whereas the investigation already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime on the ground of parity. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed on the ground of parity. 9. Let the applicant - Satish be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. October 16, 2025 R.C. BAIL No. 10143 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench