Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202032 (ALL)

SMT. SHABNAM KHATOON v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. AYUSH LKO. U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/12230/2025 · 2025-10-16

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12230 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Liberty is granted to amend prayer (i) to substitute the word 'mother' with 'husband'. 3. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief(s):- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opp. parties to consider the Ad-hoc service rendered by the petitioner's husband as qualifying service for the purposes of payment of post retiral as well as pensionary benefits." 4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director, Ayurvedic Services U.P., Indira Bhawan, Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. October 16, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Chandra Verma, Praveen Kumar Singh, Shailesh Kumar, Vibhav Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Smt. Shabnam Khatoon .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Ayush Lko. U.P. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench