Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202022 (ALL)

SARVESH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/10077/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10077 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicants seek enlargement on bail in FIR No.216 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85 BNS and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Baghauli, District Hardoi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the FIR in question was lodged alleging that the sister of the informant was married to the son of the applicants. Subsequently she was killed on account of non payment of dowry. The cause of death as per the post mortem report is ante mortem hanging. The applicants are the father in law and mother in law. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the post mortem report and there being nothing specific against the applicants of having caused physical or mental harassment of the deceased before her death with regard to demand of dowry, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicants who are in jail since 14.8.2025 and have no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicants Sarvesh and Smt Sagra @ Sudha be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Yadav, Anjali Yadav, Santosh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sarvesh And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) following conditions: (a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 10077 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench