Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202020 (ALL)

MOHD. MAZAHER ISA AND 17 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. VIGILANCE U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/12080/2025 · 2025-10-16

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12080 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:- (1) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to give the Grade Pay of Rs.5400/- to the petitioners in the Pay Band of Rs 9300-34800 with effect from the date of providing the Grade Pay of Rs 4800/-on the posts of Sub-Inspector & Inspector in the Vigilance Establishment of the State Government of UP (ii) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite parties to pay the arrears of Grade Pay in between Rs 5400/- to Rs.4800/- to the petitioners with effect from the date of providing the Grade Pay of Rs 4800/- on the posts of Sub-Inspector & Inspector in the Vigilance Establishment of the State Government of U P (iii) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite parties to revise the pension of the petitioners keeping in view the last pay drawn to be calculated on the basis of Grade Pay of Rs 5400/- and accordingly they may be provided the arrears of pension. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director General of Police, Vigilance, U.P. Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Srivastava, Manoj Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mohd. Mazaher Isa And 17 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Vigilance U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 16, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 12080 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench