RAMESH SARAN SRIVASTAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. COOPERATIVE DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/12315/2025 · 2025-10-16
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202019 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202019 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12315 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Uday Veer Singh, learned additional chief standing counsel for the State. Instant petition has been filed with following reliefs:-
"I- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite parties to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 22.05.2025 with regard to notional promotion to the petitioner to the post of Cooperative Inspector Group-II/ Assistant Development Officer (Cooperative) w.e.f. the date of his junior person i.e. 02.12.1988 and to release all the consequential benefits arising out of the same and grant pensionery benefits including its arrears to the petitioner admissible after counting the entire services rendered by the petitioner as contained ANNEXURE No.9 to this writ petition in the interest of justice. II- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite parties to grant notional promotion to the petitioner to the post of Cooperative Inspector Group-II/ Assistant Development Officer (Cooperative) w.e.f. the date of his junior person i.e. 02.12.1988 and to release all the consequential benefits arising out of the same including arrears of salary and pensionery benefits accordingly in the interest of justice. III- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite parties to grant pensionery benefits including its arrears to the petitioner admissible for the post of Cooperative Inspector Group-II/ Assistant Development Officer (Cooperative) after counting the entire services rendered by the petitioner in the interest of justice. IV- Issue such other writ, order or direction as deemed just and appropriate in the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashwini Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramesh Saran Srivastav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Cooperative Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
facts and circumstances of the case including an order as to costs in favour of petitioner in the interest of justice" After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.05.2025 within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the respondent no.2/Commissioner and Registrar Cooperative, U.P. Lucknow, is hereby
directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.05.2025, within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. October 16, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 12315 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench