Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202017 (ALL)

DEV NARAYAN @ PREM NARAYAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/6435/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6435 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.11 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85 of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station G.R.P., District Raebareli. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that that the daughter of the informant was married to the son of the applicant. Subsequently, she was harassed by the applicant and the co-accused for dowry and therefore, she jumped in front of the train and died. The applicant is the father-in-law of the deceased. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the nature of the allegations levelled against the applicant and there being nothing specific against the applicant who is aged about 65 years and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 20.05.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed . 6. Let the applicant Dev Narayan @ Prem Narayan be released on bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd.Altaf Mansoor, Aditya Vikram Singh, Tanay Chaudhary, Yogesh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dev Narayan @ Prem Narayan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 6435 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench