Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202011 (ALL)

SHAILENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/8873/2025 · 2025-10-16

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8873 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Hemant Kumar, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2. 3. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 19.05.2015 as well as summoning order dated 09.07.2025 passed in Criminal Case No. 1243 of 2015, arising out of Case Crime No. 401 of 2014, under Sections 332, 353, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Mall, District Lucknow as well as its entire proceedings. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and a compromise has been arrived between them on 18.09.2025 (appended as Annexure No. 9 to the application). 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below, before which, the case is pending. Therefore, the compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the court below itself. 6. Accordingly, the application is disposed of with direction to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Digvijai Singh, Adarsh Singh, Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Pradeep Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shailendra Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chef Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notice to all its signatories requiring their personal presence and thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court concerned and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. For a period of six weeks or till the verification of the compromise, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. 8. Registry is directed to hand over the original copy of the compromise to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining photocopy of the same. October 16, 2025 VKS A482 No. 8873 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench