Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202008 (MAD)

NAVODAYA MASS ENTERTAINMENTS LTD v. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER

WP/46443/2025 · 2025-12-02

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 46443 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 46443 of 2025 1. Navodaya Mass Entertainments Ltd By Its Managing Director Mr. Jose Punnoose, Having Registered Office At Navodaya Lands, Varadarajapuram, Dharkas Ward Ii, Chennai 132 Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office Of The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sriperumbudur 2.The Tahsildar Kundrathur Taluk Sriperumbudur District 3.The Surveyor Kundrathur Taluk Sriperumbudur District 4.The Assistant Director Of Survey And Land Records Kancheepuram And Chengalpattu Respondent(s) PRAYER directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 28.04.2025 of the petitioner and consequently direct the respondents to check verify and locate our land measuring 11 cents comprised in S.No. 415/1A at Varadharajapuram Village, Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram district as per the Title deeds and patta No. 18316 and issue a revised patta and FMB and pass For Petitioner(s): Mr R.Sankarakutralingam https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46443 of 2025 For Respondent(s): Mr D. Ravichander Special Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus, seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 28.04.2025, seeking to rectify the discrepancies found in the FMB sketch as well as in the patta pertaining to the patta number morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. Since the aforesaid representation has not been considered, the petitioner has been constrained to file this writ petition. 3. Mr. D. Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 4. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the first respondent to pass final order on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 28.04.2025, seeking for rectifying the alleged discrepancies found in the FMB sketch as well as the patta issued in favour of the petitioner pertaining to the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46443 of 2025 within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 02-12-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46443 of 2025 To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer Office Of The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sriperumbudur 2.The Tahsildar Kundrathur Taluk Sriperumbudur District 3.The Surveyor Kundrathur Taluk Sriperumbudur District 4.The Assistant Director Of Survey And Land Records Kancheepuram And Chengalpattu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46443 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 46443 of 2025 02-12-2025 (1/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis