ABDUL SATTAR RATHER v. U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT AND OTHERS
WP(C)/310/2023 · 2025-08-05
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2020 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2020 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No.310/2023
Abdul Sattar Rather
..... Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
Vs
Union Territory of J&K and others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Priyanka Bhatt, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 05.08.2025
The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing i.e. 11.03.2025 and same is the position even today. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition which is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s).
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 05.08.2025 Shammi Sr. No. 14 SHAMMI KUMAR 2025.08.07 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document