Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2020 (ALL)

CHANDRBHAN ALIAS LEELU AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

NA528/6080/2025 · 2026-04-19

Sanjiv Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 6080 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Mr. Amit Rana, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri O.P. Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., Mr. Krishna Pal Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Case No.23883 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No.202 of 2015, under Sections 452, 323, 325, 506 IPC, Police Station Rohta, District Meerut pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.03, Meerut. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants as well as opposite party Nos.2 & 3 jointly submitted that vide order dated 02.09.2025, a direction was given to the court concerned to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, the court concerned had verified the contents of compromise. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 & 3 jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the court concerned vide order dated 29.09.2025, a copy of which has been sent to this Court, which is taken on record. 5. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court below. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Rana Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Chandrbhan Alias Leelu And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid facts and considering that the parties do not wish to pursue the case any further, the dispute is essentially of a private nature and has no wider social impact. Since it has been mutually settled between the parties by way of a compromise, no useful purpose would be served by proceeding with the matter further. 8. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed and Case No.23883 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No.202 of 2015, under Sections 452, 323, 325, 506 IPC, Police Station Rohta, District Meerut pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.03, Meerut, are hereby quashed. April 20, 2026 SFH NA528 No. 6080 of 2025 2 (Sanjiv Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHIM HUSAIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad