Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201995 (MAD)

Mr.V.S.Rajendran and 4 others v. Mrs.Lakshmi and 18 others

A/5303/2025 · 2025-11-12

R N Manjula

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 5303 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA A No. 5303 of 2025 in C.S.No.808 of 2013 1. Mr.V.S.Rajendran S/o.Late V.S.Subramanian Naicker @ V.S.Mani Naicker No.1 Vembuli Naicker Garden Road Moolachatram Madhavaram Milk Colony Chennai 51 2. Mr.V.S.Raja Sayanam S/o.Late V.S.Subramanian Naicker @ V.S.Mani Naicker No.1 Vembuli Naicker Garden Road Moolachatram Madhavaram Milk Colony Chennai 51 3. Mr.V.S.Rajathilagam S/o.Late V.S.Subramanian Naicker @ V.S.Mani Naicker No.1 Vembuli Naicker Garden Road Moolachatram Madhavaram Milk Colony Chennai 51 4. Mr.Neelanesan S/o.Late V.S.Subramanian Naicker @ V.S.Mani Naicker No.1 Vembuli Naicker Garden Road Moolachatram Madhavaram Milk Colony Chennai 51 1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5303 of 2025 Applicant(s) Vs 1. Mrs.Lakshmi No.26/1, Palani Andavar Koil St, Ayanavaram, Chennai 23 2.Mr.Bhuwaneswaran No.1062, Tvs Colony, 48th St, A.A.Nagar Western Extn, Area -ii, Chennai 101 3.Kudiyarasi Old No.13, New No.18 Mandapam Lane, Kilpauk, Chennai 10 4.Rajakumari Old No.13, New No.18 Mandapam Lane, Kilpauk, Chennai 10 5.Mr.Anandakumar Dharmaraj Koil Street, Ganapathy Nagar, Kolapakkam, Chennai 602 101 6.Mrs.V.Hemanandhini D/o.Late V.S.Subramanian Naicker @ V.S.Mani Naicker No.2 Vembuli Naicker Garden Road Moolachatram Madhavaram Milk Colony Chennai 51 7.Mrs.R.Jayashree alias Jayalakshmi D/o.Late V.S.Subramanian Naicker @ V.S.Mani Naicker No.2 Vembuli Naicker Garden Road Moolachatram 2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5303 of 2025 Madhavaram Milk Colony Chennai 51 8.G.Bhuvaneswari W/o. Gowrishankar 9.G.Selvakumar S/o. Gowrishankar 10.G.Vinothini D/o. Gowrishankar 11.G.Vinod S/O. GOWRISHANKAR dEFENDANTS 15 TO 18 ARE RESIDING AT OLD NO.13, NEW NO18, MANDAPAM LANE, KILPAUK, CHENNAI-600 010 12.Mrs.K.Vijayalakshmi W/o Late G.Krishnakumar 13.K.Senthilnathan S/o Late G.Krishnakumar 14.Mrs.Jotheswari W/o.Mr.R.Gopinathan And D/o. Late G.Krishnakumar Defendatns 19 To 21 Are Residing At No.2, Kannan Nagar, Pozhichallur, Chennai-600 074. 15.Mrs.Kumuthini D/o. Late V.S.Rajaram, No.5, Vembuli Naicker Garden Road, Moolachatram, Madavaram Milk Colony, Chennai - 600 051. 3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5303 of 2025 16.Mrs.Poornima D/o. Late V.S.Rajaram, No.5, Vembuli Naicker Garden Road, Moolachatram, Madavaram Milk Colony, Chennai - 600 051. 17.Mr.Motilal S/o. Late V.S.Rajaram, No.5, Vembuli Naicker Garden Road, Moolachatram, Madavaram Milk Colony, Chennai - 600 051. 18.Mrs.P.Preethi W/o.Late.P.Vinod Alias Saravanan Hindu aged About 38 years 19.P.Jayanthi (Minor) S/o.Late.P.Vinod Alias Saravanan Hindu aged about 11 years, Represented by her Mother and Natural Guardian Mrs.P.Preehi, Defendants 28 and 29 are residing at.No.158,Metro City, 2nd Street,Ayanambakkam, chennai-600095 Respondent(s) PRAYER: Application is filed to grant leave to file additional Written Statement. For Applicant(s): Mr..K. Bijai Sundar 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5303 of 2025 For Respondent(s): Mr.M.V.Prabhakar for Mr.K.G.Vasudevan ORDER The applicants / defendants 9 to 12 & 25 to 27 has filed this application seeking to grant leave to file additional written statement and that has been resisted by the respondent / plaintiff by stating that without prejudice to the contentions raised by the plaintiff in his plaint, the additional written statement may be permitted to be filed. It is also submitted that in view of the huge delay in filing the additional written statement, costs should also be imposed. 2. As the application seeking to file additional written statement has been filed only after the trial is open, I feel this application may be allowed on condition that the applicants pay costs of Rs.2,000/- to the first respondent / plaintiff. 3. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the applicants paid a sum of Rs.2,000/- directly to the learned counsel for the first respondent who is present in the Court. The learned counsel for the first respondent also acknowledges the same. 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5303 of 2025 4. Since the cost is paid directly to the learned counsel for the first respondent by the learned counsel for the applicants, this application is allowed. 12-11-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No bkn 6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5303 of 2025 R.N.MANJULA J. bkn A No. 5303 of 2025 12-11-2025 7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis