1^P>HC010282752025 7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5939 OF 2025 Between: 1. Vijayalakshmi Dasari, D/o Dasari Satyam, Aged 40 years, R/o. H.No. 2- 57-12, Santhi Nagar, Kakinada, Kakinada District. 2. Prasanna Kumar Gowda, (A3), D/o Dasari Satyam, Aged 51 years, R/o. H.No. 2-57-12, Polisetty Vari Street, Kakinada, Kakinada District. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED N0.1&3 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by S.H.O. Sarpavaram PS, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.1 & 3 on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.99 of 2025 of Sarpavaram PS. / / / 7 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): SRI DWARAMPUDI SAVITHRI Counsel for the Respondent : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER : : / APHC010282752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] WEDNESDAY. THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5939/2025 Between: Vijayalakshmin Dasari and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. DWARAMPUDI SAVITHRI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ORDER:- This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., is filed by the petitioners herein/A1 and A3 seeking to grant anticipatory bail in Crime No.99 of 2025 of Sarpavaram Police Station, Kakinada District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) and 351 (2) read with 3(5) of the BNS. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for some time, has confined his argument to the extent of protecting the petitioners herein from the coercive action by the police on the ground that the offences alleged are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years and prays this Court to direct the police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 2. 2 *” % On the other hand oppose the learned alleged are 'earned Assistant Public Prosecutor submission did not same and counsel for the concurred with the petitioners for the made by the reason that the offences -nipnsonment Of less than material on record. punishable with i Heard. Perused the Since the offences less than seven years. alleged are punishable with i Court directs the imprisonment of seven years, this police to follow the 35(3) of the procedure Nagarik Suraksha as contemplated under Section Bharatiya es per the guidelines Sanhita, 2023 enunciated in With the above directions, Miscellaneous scrupulously, '^5. State of Bihar and another^ the Criminal Petition iIS disposed of. in the Criminal Petition, petitions, if 9ny pending, i shall stand closed. ’ (2014) 8 see 273 SO/- P.VINOD KUMAR assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, ^he Station House 2- One CC to SMT. 3. to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Pradesh at Amaravathi 4- Three CD Copies Officer, Sarpavaram Police dwarampudi Station, Kakinada. fOPUCJ High Court of Andhra SAVITHRI Advocate [OUT] Pmg TAC \ HIGH COURT DATED:02/07/2025 ORDER CRLP 5939/2025 ^ 2 <1 SEP 2025 rrentSectico^^* I Co • DISPOSING THE CRLP