Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201951 (ALL)

ZAID JAMAL KHAN v. ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF STATE ELECTION COMMISSION OF U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/10204/2025 · 2025-10-16

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10204 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the impugned appointment letter issued by the Block Development Officer, Block Gaura, District Pratapgarh i.e. opposite party no.4 dated 21.08.2025 whereby he has appointed opposite party no.6 as B.L.O. The petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to make fresh appointment on the post of B.L.O. This is a speculative and harassive litigation without any basis. Upon perusal of the writ petition it is clear that the petitioner is a busybody and has no locus to file this writ petition. The writ petition being the misconceived is dismissed in limine. October 16, 2025 Arjun/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Atul Kumar Dubey (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Zaid Jamal Khan .....Petitioner(s) Election Commissioner Of State Election Commission Of U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench