GULAAM DEEN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1493/2025 · 2025-10-16
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201936 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201936 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1493 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. No one appears on behalf of the informant despite service of notice.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.165 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85 BNS and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Pachpedva, District Balrampur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the sister in law of the deceased Farjana Khatoon Moinuddin having similar allegations has been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide order dated 25.9.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application under Section 482 BNSS No. 1351 of 2025. The applicant is the father in law.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer.
5. Considering the aforesaid submission, the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed.
6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Gulaam Deen be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till conclusion of the trial on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shourya Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gulaam Deen .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 16, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1493 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench