SARVAN @ SHRAVAN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 2 OTHERS
A482/8899/2025 · 2025-10-16
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201915 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201915 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8899 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Adarsh Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:-
"To quash the impugned summoning order dated 10.08.2017 against the petitioner passed by learned Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No-31, Lucknow in Case Crime No. 203/2015 and charge-sheet dated 04.09.2016 u/s 498-A, 323, 504 I.P.C. and 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S.- Itaunja, District- Lucknow."
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhirendra Singh, Shri Prakash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sarvan @ Shravan Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same.
October 16, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 8899 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench