SANJAY KASAUDHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/5790/2025 · 2025-10-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201893 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201893 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5790 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Arvind Kumar Maurya, learned Counsel for the informant and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.76 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85, 91, 238A of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Khodare, District Gonda. 4. Supplementary affidavit has been filed stating that certain amendment were done in the bail rejection order by the court below, which are on record and in view thereof, the applicant is permitted to make necessary correction in the present bail application also during the course of the day. 5. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that that the sister of the informant was married to the applicant. Subsequently, on account of non-payment of dowry, she was killed by the matrimonial family. The cause of death, as per the postmortem report, was ante mortem hanging. The applicant is the husband of the deceased. 6. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 7. Considering the postmortem report and there being nothing specific Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Arvind Kumar Maurya, Kanchan, Pawan Verma Sanjay Kasaudhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
against the applicant and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 12.04.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8.
Let the applicant Sanjay Kasaudhan be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 15, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 5790 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench