HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11716 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 6. Notice to the respondent no.7 is dispensed with as the petition is disposed of at the admission stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be subserved if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent nos.3 and 4 to consider and decide the representations of the petitioner dated 12.8.2025 given separately to them within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the respondent nos.3 and 4 is directed to decide the representation dated 12.8.2025 pending before them in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. October 16, 2025 Ram Murti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Puneet Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench