Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20188 (GAU)

BABUL AHMED SODIOL v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

WP(C)/5866/2023 · 2025-01-21

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010225682023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5866/2023 BABUL AHMED SODIOL SON OF LATE SUNGUL MIA SODIOL, RESIDENT OF NARAYANPUR PT-III, PO- NARAYANPUR, P.S.- HAILAKANDI, DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT BHAWAN-1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY MORTH HAILAKANDI P.O AND P.S.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R PHUKAN, Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., C.G.C.,MS. K PHUKAN (R 1),MR. S BARUAH (R 2),GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE Page No.# 2/2 ORDER Date : 22-01-2025 Mr. R. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. In view of the above, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant