Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201877 (ALL)

KARAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO

BAIL/9965/2025 · 2025-10-15

Pankaj Bhatia

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9965 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.143 of 2025 under Sections 69, 352, 351(3) BNS, P.S.- Jaitpur, District- Ambedkar Nagar. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the victim was in relation with the applicant for the past four years and on the false pretext of marriage, physical relations were formed. In the statement under Section 180 BNSS, victim has admitted that both of them liked each other and on the false pretext of marriage, physical relations were being formed for the last past two years. The victim is aged about 20 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the statement of victim, in which, she had herself admitted that she was in relation with the applicant for the past two years coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 08.07.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Karan be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Raza Mehdi, Sunil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Karan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s) sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 15, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9965 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench