Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20187 (PNJ)

MANINDER JIT SINGH v. PUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED (PUNSUP) AND ANOTHER

CWP/2887/2025 · 2025-02-03

Deepak Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 150 CWP-2887-2025 Date of Decision: 03.02.2025 MANINDER JIT SINGH …..Pe++oner Vs. PUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED (PUNSUP) AND ANOTHER …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Padam Kant Dwivedi, Advocate for the peoner. ****** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present writ peon filed by the peoner under Arcles 226/227 of the Constuon of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, direcng the respondents to consider the case of the peoner for promoon to the post of Inspector Grade-I w.e.f. 17.03.2017 and to release all the consequenal benefits upon his promoon w.e.f. 17.03.2017 including arrears of revised salary along with interest @ 9% per annum and further consider him for promoon on the post of Field Officer w.e.f. 05.10.2023, when persons junior to him have been promoted. 2. Learned counsel for the peoner, at the very outset, confines his prayer for deciding legal noce dated 15.09.2024 (Annexure P-3). He submits that at this stage, peoner would be sasfied, if the said legal noce is decided by passing a speaking order within a me bound frame. 3. Noce of moon. PRIYANKA 2025.02.04 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-2887-2025 -2- 4. Ms. Sunint Kaur, Advocate, accepts noce on behalf of the respondent No.1 and has no objecon to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the peoner. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the pares and have gone through the record of the case. 6. Keeping in view the limited prayer addressed at the me of arguments, facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, this writ peon is disposed of with a direcon to respondent No.1, to expediously decide legal noce dated 15.09.2024 (Annexure P-3), submi?ed by the peoner by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of 03 months from receipt of cerfied copy of this order. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) 03.02.2025 JUDGE pry Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PRIYANKA 2025.02.04 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document