SANTOSH SHARAD CHAUDHARI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
BA/1112/2025 · 2025-07-25
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20187 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20187 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 1112.25BA.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1112 OF 2025 SANTOSH SHARAD CHAUDHRI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA … Advocate for Applicant : Ms. R. L. Jakhade APP for Respondent : Mr. D. J. Patil ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKAR, J. DATE : 28-07-2025 PER COURT:-
1. Not on board. Taken on board.
2. A praecipe is moved for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 25.07.2025 passed by this Court in Bail Application No.1112 of 2025.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to correct the crime number and sections in the prayer clause of the application. She further submits that in the order dated 25.07.2025, her appearance may be shown. She further submits that in the order dated 25.07.2025 in para nos.2 and 7 (a), instead of ‘Crime No.351/2024’, it should be ‘Crime No.117/2025’ and in the same para, instead of ‘Sections 103 (1) and 115 (2) of BNS’, it should be ‘Sections 179 & 180 of BNS”. 2025:BHC-AUG:19471 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
2 1112.25BA.odt
4. Leave is granted to correct the prayer clauses in the application.
5. In appearance column of the order dated 25.07.2025, appearance of Advocate Ms. Rutuja S. Jakhade – Kulkarni’ be shown, so also, in para nos.2 and 7 (a), instead of ‘Crime No.351/2024’, it be substituted by ‘Crime No.117/2025’ and in the same paras, instead of ‘Sections 103 (1) and 115 (2) of BNS’, it be substituted ‘Sections 179 & 180 of BNS”.
6. Corrections be made accordingly in the aforesaid order. Motion is disposed of.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER]
JUDGE rrd This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //