SMT. SANJU DEVI AGRAHARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/1775/2024 · 2025-10-16
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201864 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201864 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1775 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Heard Sri Ram Sewak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Girijesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite order dated 13.03.2024, the Superintendent of Police, Pratapgarh has not filed any affidavit till date.
3. Learned A.G.A. submits that the affidavit was prepared on 31.03.2024. However, the same could not be filed. He has filed the same today in the Court, which is taken on record.
4. Though the affidavit, which was sworn long ago, could not have been taken on record, but learned A.G.A. submits that he has annexed a copy of decision taken by the committee in compliance of the order dated 13.03.2024 passed by this Court, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous so the same has been taken on record.
5. Perusal of the affidavit indicates that in compliance of the order dated 13.03.2024 passed by this Court, the Superintendent of Police, Pratapgarh formed a committee by means of an order dated 20.03.2024. In pursuance thereof, the committee had taken a decision dated 26.03.2024, in which though the security was withdrawn but a direction was issued to the Station House Officer, Baghrai, Pratapgarh to ensure the security/vigilance of the petitioner and intimate to the higher officers time Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Sewak, Diksha, Naveen Agrahari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Sanju Devi Agrahari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
to time.
6. In view of above, this petition has rendered infructuous.
7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, if available, under law and if so advised and required. October 16, 2025 Saurabh CRLP No. 1775 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench