HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9600 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for L.D.A. and Sri Ashok Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Considering the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to rejection of application for grant of consent to operate under relevant provisions of the statutes referred in the order dated 30.09.2024, the requisite documents and formalities have been completed and as Sri Ashok Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the respondents says that the Board will consider the application of the petitioner accordingly taking into consideration the subsequent formalities completed by the petitioner and a fresh decision would be taken, we dispose of this petition in the light of the aforesaid with a clear stipulation that such decision be taken at the earliest say within six weeks. The impugned order shall abide by fresh decision to be taken as aforesaid. October 15, 2025 Shanu/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanesh Kumar Singh, Gaurav Singh, Sachin Kumar, Shailesh Sachan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ashok Kumar Verma (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) M/S Baba Brick Field, Lucknow Thru Proprietor Baldeo Kumar Khatwani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Environment Forests And Climate Change Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench