Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201846 (ALL)

VIPIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/7254/2025 · 2025-10-15

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7254 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.0409 of 2024 under section 108 BNS, P.S. Dubagga, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was married to the applicant around thirteen years ago, and thereafter she was being harassed because of which she committed suicide. The cause of death as per the postmortem report is ante-mortem hanging. 4. Considering the material on record, prima-facie, no material exists to suggest abetment at the instance of the applicant as defined under the BNS Act and as explained in the case of Mariano Anto Bruno and another vs. Inspector of Police; 2022 SCC Online SC 1387, as such, the applicant who is in custody since 16.02.2025 and has no criminal history, he is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Vipin Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhola Singh Patel, Pravin Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vipin Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 15, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 7254 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench