AMEER HAIDER v. SHRI PAWAN KUMAR SINGH -1 LEARNED CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (CJM) RAE BAREILLY
CAPL/1246/2025 · 2025-10-15
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201833 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201833 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1246 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Mr. Shishir Jain, learned counsel representing the respondent has submitted that a direction is for the tribunal to conclude the execution proceedings expeditiously and there is no direction for the respondent who is Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raebareli but the applicant has unnecessarily arrayed him as a respondent for initiating a proceedings under Section 12 of the Courts of Contempt Act, 1971. At this stage, learned counsel for applicant has submitted that the applicant may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt application as dismissed as not pressed. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as not pressed. Notice issued earlier, if any, stands discharged. October 15, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, Akshat Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Gaurav Mehrotra (Manish Kumar,J.) Ameer Haider .....Applicant(s) Shri Pawan Kumar Singh -1 Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (Cjm) Rae Bareilly .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench