- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9287 WP No. 27531 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 27531 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. RAJALAKSHMI W/O LATE A. NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 2. MR. SRIDHAR N S/O LATE A. NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 3. MRS. POORNIMA N D/O LATE A. NARAYAN, W/O MR. SHANKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. R/AT NO.685, 3RD E MAIN RAGHAVENDRA BLOCK, SRINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 050 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.V. SRINIVASA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. H.G. PRASANNA S/O LATE RAGHAVENDRA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR'S. Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9287 WP No. 27531 of 2018 1(A). SMT. INDIRA BAI, WIFE OF LATE K. RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS. R/AT NO.236. 4TH PHASE, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE-560 064. 1(B). SMT. H.R. SUDHA WIFE OF LATE K. RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. R/AT NO.236. 4TH PHASE, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE-560 064. …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE VIDE ANNEXURE-A ORDERS PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 TO 4 BY THE HON- BLE CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE CCH 43 IN O.S.NO.7978 OF 2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XLII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE AT BANGALORE, BY SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT AND RESTORE THE SUIT TO BE PROSECUTED AGAINST THE LEGAL HEIRS OF THE RESPONDENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9287 WP No. 27531 of 2018 ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh suit. He however, submits that since the petitioners have been prosecuting this matter, under bonafide impression the time consumed in this litigation, may be allowed to be exempted. 2. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is placed on record. 3. The parties are at liberty to avail such remedy, if permissible under law. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE NG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18 CT:SNN