ABHIMANYU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/34/2025 · 2025-10-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201788 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201788 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Amritansh Mohan, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.152 of 2024, under Section 323, 363, 376(3), 504, 506 IPC & Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Motiganj, District Gonda. 3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 15 years was beaten and misbehaved. It was stated that he wants to marry the daughter by use of force. Subsequently, in the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., it was stated that since Holi, the applicant used to form physical relations with her against her consent, and she used to go and meet him very frequently. 4. My attention is also drawn to the statement of the independent witness wherein it was stated that the applicant and the victim used to talk to each other and subsequently, some compromise had also taken place and as the applicant was proposed to get married somewhere else, a fight ensued. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the fact that the physical relations were being formed around three months ago from the date of the incident coupled with the fact that the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Aman Agarwal, Ashish Raman Mishra, Pinki Devi, Shri Prakash Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pankaj Verma Abhimanyu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
medical does not corroborate the allegation and tentative age of the victim is around 15 years, the applicant, who is in custody since 15.07.2024 and has no criminal antecedent, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant Abhimanyu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 15, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 34 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench