Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201769 (ALL)

SANJAY KUMAR v. U.P. JAL NIGAM (URBAN) THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR, LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12203/2025 · 2025-10-15

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12203 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Kuldeep Singh, advocate, has put in appearance by way of filing vakalatnama on behalf of respondent(s) and the same is taken on record. 2. Heard Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. Kuldeep Singh, learned counsel for the respondent(s). 3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the competent authority for release of post retiral benefits along with interest thereof in view of the fact that petitioner has superannuated from service on 29.02.2024 and no dues certificate has also been issued to him. 4. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to move a fresh representation before respondent No. 3 i.e. The Chief Accounts Officer, U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid reliefs, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 15, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sanjay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Director, Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench