AMIR CHAND DUBEY @ AMIR CHANDRA DUBEY v. SRI MAHENDRA PRATAP, CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, AKBARPUR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR
CAPL/866/2025 · 2025-10-15
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201731 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201731 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 866 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Learned counsel for applicant has submitted that despite repeated intimation to the applicant. He is not responding the same, the present contempt application may be dismissed for want of instructions.
2. As such, the present contempt applicant is dismissed for want of instructions.
4. Notice, if any, issued to the respondent, stands discharged. October 15, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jai Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Amir Chand Dubey @ Amir Chandra Dubey .....Applicant(s) Sri Mahendra Pratap, Consolidation Officer, Akbarpur, Ambedkar Nagar .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench